This taxonomic concept whereby the unifying structures are the flagellar hairs, is broader and more appropriate for the oomycetes and their related groups. The first proposal for stramenopiles was not formally presented as a kingdom but Dick (2001) did propose that the name kingdom Straminipila be applied. Unfortunately,

there has been a fairly significant amount of confusion in the correct spelling of this name. There have been numerous combinations of vowels applied in the name as well as the incorrect usage of the Selleckchem R406 suffix “philes” instead of “piles” (Table 1). This becomes a serious impediment in this day and age of digital document searches. This is an example where having a community clearly unified under one international scientific society would help settle these technical issues by consensus or votes. However, the current usage trend should be an acceptable situation for a majority rule decision. The original colloquial name “stramenopiles” as proposed by Patterson (1989) and currently used by the NCBI taxonomy is by far the most commonly used term. The more formal kingdom name Straminipila given by

Dick (2001) and its derived adjective straminipilous are together the second most commonly used names. Table 1 Google hits (June 2011) of different spelling for the stramenopile group of organisms first proposed see more by Patterson (1989) Name searched Number of hitsa Stramenopile(s) 187,000 Straminipila 15,990 Straminipilous 54,600 Stramenopila 24,600 Straminipile(s) 9,410 Stramenophile(s) 6,360 Straminopile(s) 3,040 Stramenophila 2,740 Straminopila 1,320 Straminopilous 696 Stramenopilous 108 Stremenopile(s) 51 Stramenipile(s) 4 Stramenipilous 3 Straminiphila 3 Straminophila 3 awith or without capital letters and total number of hits for singular or plural names Ultrastructure of the zoospore The oomycete community has been proactive

in making judicious usage of technological advances that can help answer important questions, Apoptosis antagonist Pictilisib ic50 regardless of the challenges that needed to be overcome to adapt the technology to oomycetes. The usage of transmission electron microscopy to look at the ultrastructure of motile zoospores is an excellent example of a challenging technological advance. The development of this technique was done with the chytrids (Barr and Hartmann 1976; Chong and Barr 1973). The first detailed study of the ultrastructure of the flagellar apparatus of oomycete zoospores was performed by Holloway and Heath (1977). Additional species of oomycetes, hyphochytrids and thraustochytrids were studied by Barr and Allan (1985). The main features of the apparatus are the two different flagella, the basal bodies or kinetosomes, a transitional zone between these regions, and the roots which anchor the flagella. Within this apparatus defined by regions, there are conserved and more variable areas such as the flagellar roots.