The clinical significance of the mPR3 phenotype was established in independent cohorts showing that a large subset of mPR3high neutrophils is a risk factor for ANCA vasculitis. The risk factor has a negative effect on clinical patient outcomes [13,15–17]. Compared to the mPR3low cells, mPR3high neutrophils generate more superoxide and degranulate more strongly to PR3–ANCA, but not to
other stimuli. This provides a potential explanation for the clinical observation on risk and outcome [18]. Because MPO and PR3 are not transmembrane molecules, elucidating how ANCA antigens are anchored in the plasma membrane is another important step in understanding how signal transduction may begin. PR3 presentation on the neutrophil membrane occurs by at least two different
mechanisms. PR3 can be inserted directly into the plasma membrane, selleckchem as predicted by molecular dynamics simulations using a membrane model [19]. This model suggested that PR3 associates strongly with anionic membranes, whereby basic residues mediate the orientation of PR3 at RGFP966 mw the membrane and hydrophobic amino acids mediate anchoring of the molecule. Kantari et al. mutated the basic and the hydrophobic amino acids and observed that the modified PR3 preserved its enzymatic activity. However, the mutated protein lost its plasma membrane expression in a myeloid rat basophilic leukaemic (RBL) cell model [20]. Another way of expressing PR3 on the neutrophil membrane is its presentation by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked receptor, namely CD177 (or human neutrophil antigen Neratinib mw B1, NB1) [21,22]. Although all neutrophils contain intracellular PR3, only those cells that express NB1 protein on the neutrophil plasma membrane show
high mPR3 surface expression. Studies have demonstrated further that PR3 and NB1 were not only co-expressed on the same neutrophil subset, but that both molecules co-localize and co-immunoprecipitate. Co-transfection experiments in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells showed that NB1 was a sufficient receptor for PR3, but not for pro-PR3 [23]. Future experiments need to elucidate the control mechanisms of NB1 expression and why only a subset of neutrophils generates NB1 protein. Korkmaz et al. showed that a unique hydrophobic patch, present on human and absent from gibbon and murine PR3, enabled binding to NB1 [24]. Choi et al. performed high-throughput screening using a small molecule library and identified compounds that inhibited the interaction between NB1 and PR3 [25]. Kuhl et al. characterized conformational PR3 epitopes recognized by monoclonal anti-PR3 antibodies or PR3–ANCA from patients. These epitopes are distinct from the catalytic site and from the hydrophobic patch that allowed binding to membranes and NB1 [26].