PubMedCrossRef 44. Wani RA, Parray FQ, Bhat NA, Wani MA, Bhat TH, Farzana F: Non traumatic terminal ileal perforation. World J Emerg Surg 2006, 1:7.PubMedCrossRef 45. Urassa M, Isingo R, Kumogola Y, Mwidunda P, Helelwa M, Changulucha J, Mngara J, Zaba B, Calleja T, Slaymaker E:

Effect of PMTCT availability on choice of ANC in Mwanza and Magu districts and its impact on HIV sentinel surveillanc. Tanzania: Report of ANC surveillance Mwanza and Magu Districts 2007. 46. Beniwal US, Jindal D, Sharma J, Jain S, Shyman G: JPH203 price Comparative study of operative procedures in typhoid selleckchem perforation. Indian J Surg 2003, 65:172–7. 47. Kella N, Radhi PK, Shaikh AR, Leghari F: Qureshi MA: Factors affecting the surgical outcome in typhoid intestinal perforation in children. Paed Surg 2010,16(4):567–570. 48. Kaybal I, Gokcora IH, Kaybal M: A contemporary evaluation of enteric perforation in typhoid fever; analysis of 257 cases. Int Surg YH25448 cost 1990, 75:96–100. 49. Elesha SO: Pathology and pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Nig P Med J 1994, 1:38. 50. Shah AA, Wani KA, Wazir BS: The ideal treatment of typhoid enteric perforation- resection anastomosis. Int Surg 1999, 84:35–8.PubMed 51. Mawalla B, Mshana SE, Chalya PL, Imirzalioglu C, Mahalu W: Predictors of surgical site infections among patients undergoing major surgery at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Surgery

2011, 11:21.PubMedCrossRef 52. Karmacharya B, Sharma VK: Results of typhoid perforation management: our experience in Bir Hospital, Nepal. Kathmandu University Med J 2006, 4:22–24. 53. Meier DE, Tarpley JL: Typhoid intestinal

perforations in Nigerian children. World J Surg 1998, 22:319–323.PubMedCrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions PLC contributed in study design, literature search, data analysis, manuscript writing, editing and submission of the manuscript. JBM, MK, HJ, SEM, MM and GG participated in study Selleck Sunitinib design, data analysis, manuscript writing & editing. MDM participated in data analysis, literature search, manuscript writing & editing. JMG supervised the study and contributed in data analysis, manuscript writing & editing. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“After years of initial aggressive surgical intervention and a subsequent shift to damage control surgery (DCS), non operative management (NOM) has been shown to be safe and effective. In fact trauma surgeons realized that in liver trauma, it was safer to pack livers [1] than do finger fracture [2] or resection, and this represented a tangential issue to nonoperative approach. Damage control was not the paradigm shift for spleen and liver, but rather to address coagulopathy that was more commonly associated with penetrating major abdominal vascular injuries [3].