The selection www.selleckchem.com/products/Gemcitabine-Hydrochloride(Gemzar).html of the interactive task considered, among other things, the following issues, Shared interest in the biocuration community, Linking a gene mention to a database identifier and retriev ing articles for genes with experimental information were common denominators among majority of the UAG curation activities. However, biocurators extract annotations for genes proteins based on experi mental data described in the literature, therefore, we introduced a ranking of genes based on relation of the gene protein and its species to experimental evidence. Expertise of UAG members relevant to evaluate the systems, In this case the group decided to focus on a text mining task for biocuration.

Maturity of the task, The goal was to select a text mining task with reasonable performance, such as gene normalization, which has been evaluated in pre vious BioCreative challenges, to focus on providing the necessary features and interactive decision support to help the biocurator in the difficult curation cases. Time frame and teams commitment, The task was chosen to be realistic given the time needed for develo pers to provide functional systems by the time of the workshop, and to encourage teams to parti cipate and deliver in a timely fashion. Add some novelty to the task selected, The use of full length articles, the gene ranking, document retrieval and ranking, and request for user friendly interface with functionalities to facilitate curation were included. Based on all these considerations, the IAT task was restricted to gene normalization and gene oriented document retrieval in full length articles.

Both tasks requested that systems rank results based on overall importance of the gene in the article. We believe this task still reflects a basic task shared by existing literature bio curation workflows. Defining the concept of centrality and gene ranking To address the gene and document ranking criteria, the UAG discussed and defined the concept of gene central ity. The basic idea was to base the ranking on those genes associated with experimental results, as this is the feature most commonly driving literature based annota tion, and to rank these genes higher than other genes mentioned. Ultimately, the centrality concept would assist in identifying the set of genes in the article that are potentially relevant to the biocurator, and assist in ranking the genes according to overall importance in the article.

In turn, this would also help in the retrieval AV-951 of relevant documents about a particular gene. In the end, the biocurator would be able to know, for example, that a given article has some type of assertion about genes A, B, C, and D, but it is mostly about genes A and C. To come up with a consensus definition of centrality, nine members of the UAG curated the same two full length articles and selected the genes having some level of experimen tal information.