The same procedure

is repeated for the rest sutures as we

The same procedure

is repeated for the rest sutures as well as at the posterior vessel wall (Figs. 1F and 1G). We performed this technique in 30 venous and 15 arterial anastomoses during free tissue transfer. In 15 free flaps, both the arterial and venous anastomoses were performed with the described method, meanwhile in other 15 free flaps, the arterial anastomoses were performed with the conventional method Pirfenidone and the venous anastomosis with the “continuous-interrupted” technique. In both of the groups, no complications were noted performing this technique as all the flaps survived well. Furthermore, the same surgeon in anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) flaps performed 20 venous anastomoses, 10 with the conventional technique, and 10 with the proposed method in order

to compare the time difference between the two methods in vessels with the same size. Statistically significant less time was required (P < 0.05) for the venous anastomosis with the “continuous-interrupted” method. The described method for microvascular anastomosis has several advantages. First of all, the application of the sutures can be very precise as the loosely running suture leaves spaces between the vessels, allowing the lumen to be visible without extensive manipulation of the vessel. This is very useful especially when the last suture of the anterior and posterior wall is applied, which with the conventional method there is limited space between the two edges of vessels. Similarly, during the anastomosis, the posterior vessel wall is always visible, avoiding inadvertent two-wall sewing. Additionally, https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Everolimus(RAD001).html even though the suture is applied continuously, finally

tied as the interrupted fashion, hence there is no risk of stenosis at the anastomotic site. Finally, the anastomosis is performed faster than the conventional method, as the surgeon saves time applying the sutures with a running manner. Stamatis Sapountzis, M.D.* “
“The most suitable free flap alternative in upper extremity reconstruction has adequate and quality of tissue with consistent vascular pedicle. Free flap must provide convenient tissue texture to reconstruct aesthetic and functional units of upper extremity. Furthermore, minimal donor site morbidity is preferred features Pregnenolone in free flap election. In our efforts to obtain the best possible outcome for patients, we chose, as a first priority, the free superficial circumflex inferior artery (SCIA)/superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap over other free flap options for the soft-tissue reconstruction of upper extremities. The authors retrospectively report the results of 20 free SCIA/SIEA flaps for upper extremity reconstruction during the past 3 years. Nineteen of 20 flaps were successful (95%): three required emergent postoperative reexploration of the anastomosis and one failed.

Comments are closed.