The elevated diversity in the zoo apes cannot be due to sample size, as the sample sizes for the zoo apes are considerably smaller than those for the sanctuary apes. Moreover, rarefaction analysis (Additional file 2: Figure S1) indicates that the elevated diversity in the zoo apes is not an artifact of differences in sequencing depth. Instead,

this extraordinary diversity appears to be an inherent feature of the saliva microbiome of the zoo apes. In fact, the rarefaction analysis suggests that much diversity remains to be documented in the zoo ape saliva microbiomes, so the patterns noted below may change with additional sampling. Table 2 Statistics for the microbiome diversity in zoo apes Species Number of individuals Number of sequences Number of OTUs Unknown (%) Unclassified(%) Number Bucladesine cell line of see more genera Variance between individuals (%) Variance within individuals (%) Bonobo 3 558 247 4.3 5.9 54 2.1 97.8 Chimpanzee 5 2263 700 8.8 4.5 135 1.7 98.3 Gorilla 4 1943 644 5.9 8.8 100 4.2 95.8 Orangutan 5 2174 562 4.9 4.3 93 0.8 99.2 Unknown (%) is the percentage

of sequences that do not match a sequence in the RDP database. Unclassified is the percentage of sequences that match a sequence in the RDP database for which the genus has not been classified. The relative abundance of the predominant genera in zoo apes vs. sanctuary apes is shown in Figure 2B. These 32 genera VX809 accounted for 96.7% of all sequences in sanctuary apes but only 87% in zoo apes. At the phylum level, sanctuary and zoo apes showed comparable relative abundances, except for the presence of the Deinococcus phylum in zoo apes. However differences were seen within phyla,with the most striking differences seen in the Gamma-Proteobacteria; zoo apes were virtually free of Enterobacteriaceae

but instead had a much higher abundance of Neisseria and Kingella. Pasteurellaceae were present PFKL in roughly equal proportions in sanctuary and zoo apes. With one exception (Granulicatella), genera within the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria had consistently higher abundances in zoo than in sanctuary apes. No consistent trend could be observed for the genera within Fusobacteria and Bacteroidetes, however overall those two phyla were more abundant in sanctuary apes (Figure 2B). The average Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient based on the frequency of genera among pairs of individuals was 0.51 (range 0.50-0.57) within each species of zoo ape and 0.51 (range 0.49 – 0.54) between each pair of species of zoo ape. For the zoo apes, the within-species correlations are thus closer to (and in some cases even overlap) the between-species correlations, compared to the correlations for the humans vs. the sanctuary apes. Nevertheless, the ANOSIM analysis indicates that the between-species differences are significantly greater than the within-species differences for the zoo apes (p = 0.0002 based on 10,000 permutations).