\n\nObjective: Cancer patients and partners often report inadequate communication about ill-nessrelated issues, although it is essential for mutual support and informal caregiving. This study examined the patterns of change in dyadic communication between patients with prostate cancer and their partners, and also

determined if certain factors affected their communication over time.\n\nMethod: Using multilevel modeling, this study analyzed longitudinal data obtained from a randomized clinical trial with prostate cancer patients and their partners, to examine their communication over time. Patients and partners (N=134 pairs) from the usual-care control group independently completed baseline demographic assessment and measures of social support, uncertainty, symptom distress, and dyadic communication at baseline, and 4-, 8-, and 12-month Selleckchem Dinaciclib follow-ups.\n\nResults: The results indicated that (1) patients and partners reported similar levels of open communication at the time of diagnosis. Communication https://www.selleckchem.com/products/azd2014.html reported by patients and partners decreased over time in a similar trend, regardless of phase of illness; (2) phase of illness affected couples’ open communication at diagnosis but not patterns of change over time; and (3) couples’

perceived communication increased as they reported more social support, less uncertainty, and fewer hormonal symptoms in patients. Couples’ demographic factors and general symptoms, and GW3965 inhibitor patients’ prostate cancer-specific symptoms did not affect their levels of open communication.\n\nConclusions: Perceived open communication between prostate cancer patients and partners over time is affected by certain baseline and time-varying psychosocial and cancer-related factors. The results provide empirical evidence that may guide the development of strategies to facilitate couples’ interaction

and mutual support during survivorship. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“Objective. This study investigated the prevalence of calcified carotid artery atheromas (CCAAs) in panoramic radiographs of HIV-positive patients.\n\nStudy Design. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the presence of CCAA in 300 panoramic radiographs. Qualitative variables were compared using the c 2 test or Fisher exact test, as needed. The Mann-Whitney or Student t test was used for the quantitative variables.\n\nResults. In the studied group, 8.2% presented CCAA. Among these patients, most used lopinavir/ritonavir (P = .0459), had a greater mean age (P = .0081), and displayed a lower nadir CD4 (P = .0195). The use of lopinavir/ritonavir increased the chances of CCAA by approximately 2.8-fold compared with those who did not use medication (odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.95; P = .045).\n\nConclusions. The variables that were associated with the identification of CCAA are compatible with the known atherogenic risk factors in patients with HIV.