He explained that evidence-based practice is the integration of research evidence together with clinical expertise and patients’ values to inform decisions about clinical practice and optimise patient care ( Figure 1) ( Sackett et al 1996). Somehow, two-thirds Selleckchem 3 Methyladenine of this model – the therapist’s clinical expertise and the patient’s values – seem to have been lost in translation to the current understanding of evidence-based practice. As would be universally recognised by physiotherapists, clinical expertise – the proficiency clinicians develop from clinical practice – has been and always will be

an essential cornerstone of clinical practice. Perhaps what is less well recognised is that it is also a central tenet of the paradigm of evidence-based practice, where clinical DAPT research buy expertise is considered pivotal in the judicious application of research evidence to decision-making and patient care. Sackett and colleagues (1996) state: research evidence can inform, but can never replace, clinical expertise; without clinical expertise, practice risks becoming tyrannised by evidence, because even excellent evidence may be inapplicable to or inappropriate for an individual

patient, as every good clinician would be well aware. Similarly lost in translation is the explicit consideration of patients’ values in the evidence-based practice model. In Sackett’s words, the best evidence needs to be considered together with the more thoughtful identification and compassionate use of individual patients’ predicaments, rights and preferences in making clinical decisions about their care. This is summed up well in the following comment by Herbert

and colleagues (2001): the best decisions are made with the patient, not found in journals and books. As physiotherapists we must, at the very least, fulfil the legal requirement to obtain valid informed consent for treatment, which requires the disclosure of possible benefits and risks. This requires physiotherapists to have up-to-date knowledge about treatment options, based on good clinical research, to discuss with patients in a co-operative decision-making model. This can be illustrated by a simple clinical example. A young adult with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease has restricted ankle dorsiflexion range of movement. found A randomised controlled trial has shown that serial night casting improves ankle dorsiflexion range in this population (Rose et al 2010). Despite this, the physiotherapist might suggest an alternative intervention if the patient lives alone and would require assistance to apply the removable casts. In another example, a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been referred for pulmonary rehabilitation. A randomised trial has shown that walk training and training on an exercise bike have similar effects on peak exercise capacity and quality of life, but that walk training provides greater benefit in walking endurance (Leung et al 2010).