Ezetimibe was resolved

in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and DMSO was used as control. MCA-RH7777 cells from the American Type Culture Collection were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine (Equitech-Bio, Kerrville, TX, USA) and 10% horse serum (Invitrogen). The cells were cultured at 37°C under 5% CO2 humidified air. After overnight incubation, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and first pretreated with or without ezetimibe (50 μM) for 16 h and then exposed to carbon tetrachloride (CCL4; 1 mM) (Wako, Osaka, Japan) in the presence or absence of ezetimibe (50 μM) for 8 h. Mitosox Red Mitochondrial superoxide indicator (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) Rucaparib manufacturer was used for detecting localized Fulvestrant nmr intracellular sources of ROS following the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescent images from multiple fields of view were captured using a fluorescence microscope (KEYENCE BZ-8000 microscope). Intracellular ROS level was determined using 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species Detection Assay Kit (Abcam) following the manufacturer’s

instructions. All results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were made using the two-independent samples Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and one-way anova. Differences with P < 0.05 were regarded as significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows ver. 17. WE MONITORED FOOD 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl consumption and bodyweight of all groups throughout the observation period. Baseline bodyweight,

final bodyweight, liver weight, and liver weight to bodyweight ratio were similar in the CT and the EZ (Table 1). Liver TG content in EZ was lower than that in CT (P < 0.05) (Table 1). Liver ROS level in EZ was also lower than that in CT (P < 0.05) (Table 1). Food consumption and bodyweight variation were similar in CT and EZ (Supporting information Fig. S1). Ezetimibe group showed smaller lipid deposits and minimal inflammatory cell infiltrates, evaluated by HE-staining and Oil red O staining, compared with CT (Fig. 1a,b). Regarding NASH activity score, EZ had a lower score than CT (1.0 ± 0.8 in EZ vs 2.7 ± 0.8 in CT, P < 0.01) (Table 1). Regarding fibrosis, EZ showed a lower degree of liver fibrosis than CT (Fig. 1b). The fibrosis score was significantly different between the two groups (0.9 ± 0.3 in EZ vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 in CT, P < 0.01) (Table 1). Fasting glucose levels in EZ were lower at 30, 60 and 90 min during ipGTT than those in CT; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (Supporting information Fig. S2). Serum total cholesterol and TG levels in EZ were lower than those in CT; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance.