Eloi Kpamegan for his statistical analysis of the data. We also thank Sigmovir Inc. for performing the cotton rat animal studies. RSV F specific monoclonal antibodies 1107, 1112, 1153, and 1243 were provided by Dr. Judy Beeler FDA (WHO Repository). Conflict of interest statement The authors are employees of Novavax. “
“The pace of new vaccine introductions E7080 manufacturer in low- and middle-income countries has been accelerating in the past decade and will continue [1]. This has led to increased

attention on their broader impact, with the possibility that they may either stress or strengthen health systems in these countries. In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) set up an ad-hoc working group to explore the issue for their Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation [1]. Members of the team for the present study participated in this group and our preliminary results informed the group’s findings and recommendations [2]. There is a lack of research focusing Decitabine on the impact of new vaccine introductions on countries’ expanded programme

of immunisation (EPI) or health system as a whole, particularly in low-income countries [3] and [4]. Previous research has typically focused either on the impact of vaccination campaigns on the routine immunisation service [5], [6], [7] and [8], or the impact of new vaccine introductions on specific elements of the health system, such as cold chain [9], logistics and supply [10] and [11] or coverage [12]. The EPI is traditionally a relatively vertical programme, although routine immunisation is arguably more integrated than vaccination campaigns. Research on the health system impact of other vertical health programmes, including vaccination campaigns, have identified both positive and negative effects [6], [13], [14], [15] and [16]. It has also been noted that these impacts varied depending on the strength of the health system [6] and [15]. This study aimed to explore impact of new vaccine

introductions on immunisation programmes and the Vasopressin Receptor broader health system. It did not aim to estimate the costs of new vaccine introductions as this would require a different type of methodology and has been the focus of another multi-country research project. We conducted mixed-method case studies of seven vaccine introductions in six low- and middle-income countries (see Table 1 for details). The study team comprised staff from The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), as well as at least one collaborator per case study country. Data collection was conducted by both the country collaborators and LSHTM staff. Countries were selected to include a range of vaccines, presentations, delivery strategies and financing mechanisms. Countries were eligible for inclusion if they planned to introduce a new vaccine in 2010 or 2011, in order for this introduction to be sufficiently recent at the time of data collection.