Economic performance issues and indicators show whether a strong and sustainable coastal economy is being promoted and supported. Environmental DAPT purchase quality performance

issues and indicators demonstrate the availability of sustainable environmental practices and the way they are promoted. Social performance issues and indicators measure social unity and resiliance (SUSTAIN partnership, 2012b). Table 1 gives an overview of the core indicators and their allocation to issues and pillars. More detailed descriptions for each indicator and its units are provided in the SUSTAIN partnership (2012a). After the relevant data is collected and indicator values assigned during MK-2206 the ‘indicator application’ phase, a moderated stakeholder exercise takes place, which uses matrices to determine the relative importance of the issues and pillars (weighting), which

is then combined with the indicator values. Together, both the indicator application and the weighting exercise form the full SUSTAIN methodology, and are included in the DeCyDe tool by Isotech Ltd, Cyprus (Loizidou and Loizides, 2012). We focus on the first part of this methodology, the indicator application. The core indicators are mandatory and were used in both study sites, Neringa and Warnemünde. We largely followed the stepwise approach described in SUSTAIN partnership (2012b). First, the relevant data for each core indicator were collected. Second, each indicator was scored using the assessment mafosfamide protocols. The data was then attributed to one of six appropriate classes and converted into class values from 0 to 10 based on predefined ranges. These class

values were averaged for each issue and summed to receive a total score for the pillar. If data was imprecise or unavailable, the data was approximated. SUSTAIN provides EXCEL spread-sheets, which use entered scores to automatically calculate aggregated results for issues and pillars. In a third step, the results would be presented to and discussed with local and regional stakeholders during workshops. The purpose of this interactive discussion is to evaluate whether the set of indicators both meets local demand and is sufficient to provide a realistic picture of the state of sustainability. If not, additional optional indicators can be added to tailor the set to those specific needs. We left this step out of our case study and focused exclusively on scoring core indicators in order to keep the results comparable. In both study sites, the application exercise was carried out by local postgraduate students (Klaipeda University resp. Rostock University) with varying scientific background. Five groups worked in Neringa in September 2012 (25 students) and four groups in Warnemünde in January 2013 (20 students).