Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005, 21:605–631 PubMedCrossRef 43 Reynol

Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005, 21:605–631.PubMedCrossRef 43. Reynolds KT, Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA: The effects of host age, host nuclear background and temperature on phenotypic effects of the virulent Wolbachia strain popcorn in Drosophila melanogaster . Genetics 2003, 164:1027–1034.PubMed 44. Voronin DA, Bocherikov AM, Baricheva

EM, Zakharov IK, Kiseleva EV: Action of genotypical surrounding of host Drosophila melanogaster on biological effects of endosymbiont Wolbachia (strain wMelPop). Cell and Tissue Biology 2009,3(3):263–273.CrossRef 45. Braig HR, Zhou W, Dobson SL, O’Neill SL: Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia selleck compound pipientis . J Bacteriol 1998,180(9):2373–2378.PubMed 46. Mpoke SS, Wolfe J: Differential staining of apoptotic nuclei in living cells: application to macronuclear elimination in Tetrahymena . J Histochem Cytochem 1997,45(5):675–683.PubMedCrossRef 47. Abrams JM, White K, www.selleckchem.com/products/frax597.html Fessler LI, Steller H: Programmed cell death during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development Selleckchem JSH-23 1993, 117:29–43.PubMed 48. Gold R, Schmied M, Giegerich G, Breitschopf H, Hartung HP, Toyka KV, Lassmann H: Differentiation

between cellular apoptosis and necrosis by the combined use of in situ tailing and nick translation techniques. Lab Invest 1994, 71:219–225.PubMed 49. Terasaki M, Runft L, Hand AR: Changes in organization of the endoplasmic reticulum during Xenopus oocyte maturation and activation. Mol Biol Cell 2001, 12:1103–1116.PubMed Authors’ contributions MZ performed the experiments. EK and MZ both designed the study, drafted and wrote the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final text. Competing interests The authors declare Ureohydrolase that they have no competing interests.”
“Background Symbiotic communities of eukaryotic organisms are known to influence host developmental programs [1] and also to shape immune response against pathogens [2]. Interestingly, some genes/pathways (e.g. programmed cell death) have a pleiotropic role in immunity and development, and could play a major role in the maintenance of a specific bacterial

community. For instance, the homeobox gene Caudal is involved in the formation of the antero-posterior body axis of Drosophila, but also in the regulation of the commensal gut microbiota [3]. In the squid-vibrio association, it has recently been shown that the regulation of a peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP), classically involved in innate immunity, plays a role in the activation of the apoptotic process initiating the morphogenetic changes of the symbiont-harboring organ [4]. The generality of the interplay between immunity and development during symbiosis is currently unknown. Wolbachia (Anaplasmataceae) is among the most abundant intracellular bacteria. It infects both arthropods and nematodes, and is known to be a master manipulator of host biology [5].

Comments are closed.