This residual prey protein, which is 12C-labeled because the bait for two-step fishing is https://www.selleckchem.com/products/17-DMAG,Hydrochloride-Salt.html expressed in complex medium, would otherwise lead to erroneously low or even negative association scores. When assessing the methods, we found that in most cases one-step bait fishing allowed a clear differentiation between specifically enriched proteins (which were then considered to be interaction partners) and the vast majority of background proteins through the association score. However, in a few cases, certain expected interaction partners showed an association score close to zero in one-step bait fishing (e. g.,
CheW1 copurified with CheA, Figure 2A). This was even more surprising since these proteins were identified with very
high sequence coverage (the percentage of the protein sequence covered by matching peptides) with the corresponding baits (and with very low sequence coverage or not at all with other baits), which indicates selleck kinase inhibitor specific enrichment. The reason for this is probably exchange of the prey protein from the bait-CBD lysate and the bait-control CB-5083 lysate in the short time (2–3 minutes) between mixing the lysates and washing unbound proteins away. Figure 2 Comparing one-step and two-step bait fishing using the bait CheA as an example. The association score of the identified proteins is plotted against the sequence coverage with which the prey protein was identified. The dashed line indicates the threshold used in this Farnesyltransferase study for assuming an interaction. For the underlying data see Additional file 3 and Additional file 4. A One-Step bait fishing. Several Htrs along with their associated proteins as well as the novel interactors PurNH and OE4643R were identified with high association scores. However, the association score for the expected interactor CheW1 is almost 0, which means the SILAC ratio was close to 1, even though this prey was identified with an unusually high sequence coverage. This indicates an enrichment by CheA. B Two-Step bait fishing. Here the interaction with CheW1 is clearly identified, whereas the interactions
with the Htrs and with PurNH and OE4643R, which were later confirmed with these proteins as bait, are not detected. PurNH, OE4643R and several Htrs were not even identified, which indicates no or at least much weaker enrichment of these proteins in two-step bait fishing compared to one-step bait fishing. With two-step bait fishing, the CheA-CheW1 interaction could be clearly demonstrated (Figure 2B). In contrast, the interactions of CheA with Htrs as well as the novel interactors PurNH and OE4643R (discussed below), which were identified by one-step bait fishing, were missed in the two-step experiment. Hence both methods miss certain interactions which can be detected by the other method. Aside from affinity, the properties determining the detectability of an interaction by one-step or two-step bait fishing are mainly the association and dissociation kinetics.