The gels were then stained with silver nitrate (15). As shown in Figure 1, the DGGE profiles of the three primer sets were displayed differently on the gels. Primer pair V3-s and V3-a, amplifying the V3 region of 16S rDNA, generated a major band and multiple minor bands for P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum, but multiple minor bands without a major bands for P. nigrescens (Fig. 1a). Previous reports have also shown multiple bands for the V1 regions of enterococci 16S rDNA on DGGE gels and the V3 region of P. intermedia

(13, 16). To exclude the possibility that PCR artifacts Alectinib or DGGE electrophoresis conditions led to the multiple bands, the PCR and DGGE conditions were modified, but no differences were observed on DGGE gel (data not shown). However, primer pair V3-s and V3/5-a, amplifying the V3-V5 region of 16S rDNA, generated single bands for each strain at different positions on the gel, and the bands of the three bacterial species were distinguishable from each other (Fig. 1b). Primer pair V6/8-s and V6/8-a, amplifying

the V6-V8 region of 16S rDNA, generated a major band and a minor band for all three strains (Fig. 1c). From this result, it was concluded that the amplicons of 16S rDNA of the V3 region may cause overestimation of subgingival bacterial populations in DGGE analysis. PI3K inhibitor It was suspected that the single minor band in the V6-V8 region DGGE gels might alter the final analysis by overestimation of the bacterial populations. Finally, as the amplicons of V3-V5 and V6-V8 had originally been used for DGGE assessment of subgingival samples, these two 16S rDNA regions were then applied to clinical plaque samples. Subgingival dental plaque samples were obtained from the Department of Periodontology, Clomifene Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, as described previously (17). Briefly, six non-smoking adult patients (age 29–52 years, mean age 39 years, four women and two men) with chronic periodontitis

participated in this study. All patients received a detailed description of the proposed treatment and gave informed consent. Subgingival samples were collected from periodontal pockets using sterile curettes with a probing depth and clinical attachment loss of more than 5 mm at the baseline (17). The patients received oral hygiene instruction and full mouth supra- and sub-gingival scaling, but no antibiotics. Six weeks after mechanical debridement, the patients were reviewed and clinical examination showed significant improvement in the condition of their periodontiums. Subgingival plaque was again sampled from the same pockets as before (the probing depth was decreased by 2 or 3 mm).