By contrast, no increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was observed in patients not responding to treatment (79 ± 9 versus 73 ± 14 mm Hg; P value not significant). Several variables obtained at baseline were analyzed for predictive value of response https://www.selleckchem.com/products/azd3965.html to treatment (Table 3). Variables associated with response to treatment (P < 0.10) were serum aspartate aminotrasferase, serum alanine aminotranferase, MELD score, urine volume, leukocyte count, and serum bilirubin. Of note, neither serum creatinine
nor arterial pressure levels at baseline were associated with response to therapy. In the multivariate analysis, only serum bilirubin (odds ratio, 0.913; 95% confidence interval, 0.853-0.978; P = 0.01) was associated with an independent predictive value of response to treatment. The cutoff level of serum bilirubin that best predicted response to treatment, Ivacaftor molecular weight as assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves, was 10 mg/dL (area under the curve, 0.77; P < 0.0001; sensitivity, 89%; specificity,
61%). Response rates in patients divided according to baseline serum bilirubin ≥10 mg/dL or <10 mg/dL were 13% (2/15) and 67% (16/24), respectively (P = 0.001). There was a trend for an association between baseline leukocyte levels and response to treatment, but the difference did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.825; 95% confidence interval, 0.674-1.009; P = 0.061). To investigate whether changes in arterial pressure during the early period of treatment with terlipressin and albumin could be useful as a predictive factor of response, we analyzed response rates in patients Interleukin-3 receptor divided according to changes in arterial pressure measured at day 3 of treatment. The value of MAP used was the average value of all measurements of arterial pressure obtained at day 3; an increase in MAP of 5 mm Hg was considered relevant and used as
a cutoff value. Patients with an increase in MAP equal to or greater than 5 mm Hg at day 3 of treatment had a response rate at the end of therapy of 73% (8/11) compared with 36% (10/28) in patients with an increase that did not reach 5 mm Hg or a decrease in MAP (P = 0.037). When the increase in arterial pressure of 5 mm Hg at day 3 was included in the multivariate analysis together with the same baseline variables mentioned above, the independent predictive factors of response to therapy were baseline serum bilirubin levels and an increase in MAP ≥5 mm Hg at day 3 (Table 4). Response rates in the subgroups of patients divided according to the selected cutoff values for these two parameters are shown in Table 5. Finally, to assess whether an early reduction in serum creatinine during treatment was predictor of response to therapy, we analyzed the relationship between changes in serum creatinine at day 3 compared with baseline with response at the end of treatment.