The MRI observers will document imaging findings in the on line CRF as described earlier for US and CT. Afterwards; all MRI examinations will be scrutinized by central reading by a MRI expert committee with the same clinical

information as the initial MRI readers to establish a reference of optimal MRI accuracy for comparison with clinical practice MRI accuracy. Patient management Patients will be managed based on the US and CT findings. MRI will not be used for management, except in equivocal findings at US and CT, or in case of other clinically important findings at MRI that were undetected at US and CT. Reference standard Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical An expert panel consisting of two surgeons and a radiologist will assign a final Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical diagnosis after a follow-up period of 3 months, based on all available information: clinical information, imaging findings (except MRI findings), surgery, pathology and follow up. General practitioners will be contacted to assess

whether patients had an appendectomy in another hospital, or an alternative diagnosis assigned. The flowchart in figure ​figure11 demonstrates the complete clinical pathway of included patients Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in the OPTIMAP study. Figure 1 The OPTIMAP study flowchart. Data Analysis Data analysis primarily will focus on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in correctly identifying patients with appendicitis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of MRI in detecting acute appendicitis will be calculated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, by comparing the results of MRI, as read by trained radiologists and the MRI expert panel, with the final diagnosis I-BET151 order assigned by the expert Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical panel. In addition, the accuracy of the following scenarios Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical will be estimated: (1) Clinical evaluation without imaging, (2) US in all patients followed by CT after a non diagnostic US, (2) US only, (3) MRI only, (4) US followed by MRI after a non diagnostic US. A gain in diagnostic value of strategies using two tests

Fossariinae will be evaluated using the likelihood ratio based method proposed by McAskill and colleagues [10]. Next, we will evaluate the diagnostic performance of stratified imaging strategies taking into account patient characteristics (e.g. age, gender) and presentation features (e.g. duration of complaints). We will also investigate accuracy modifiers, such as body mass index and gender, which are known to influence the diagnostic performance of some imaging modalities. For the cost evaluation, we will estimate and compare the total imaging costs for each imaging strategy. Standard unit prices will be used for all imaging modalities. Total imaging costs in multi-modality strategies will be driven by the positivity rate of the first imaging procedure.